A week ago today a man named Jim D. Adkisson walked into a Unitarian Church he had never visited in Knoxville, Tennessee and opened fire on the congregation, none of whom he knew, killing two people.  During his interrogation, police found that Adkisson “had targeted the church because of its liberal leanings and his belief that all liberals should be killed because they were ruining the country.”  Adkisson was a loner who hates “blacks, gays and anyone different from him,” longtime acquaintance Carol Smallwood of Alice, Texas said.  Police are exploring hate crime charges.

This to me is a horrifyingly fascinating example of the paranoia that drives the extreme right in this country, a twisted mindset in which they are somehow the “victims” of people whom they have never met and who have done nothing to cause their troubles.  Adkisson seems to have had an unhappy life – lost his job, lost his wife (whom he battered), didn’t have much positive going on – and somehow had been convinced by the phalanx of rightwing gasbags typified by Rush Limbaugh that “liberals” were to blame for his woes.  What happened last Sunday is proof that if you pour enough gasoline on wood, sooner or later someone is going to strike a match around it and a conflagration will break out.  Yet no one seems to hold these commentators responsible for creating the mindset that made it seem reasonable for Mr. Adkisson to walk into a church where children were performing Annie on a quiet July Sunday and shoot people he didn’t know.  They were, after all, the hated liberals who are to blame for all of our nation’s ills.  I wonder if he now has a job and his wife has taken him back.  Somehow I doubt it.

The other thing that amazes me if how little attention this has gotten.  I try to imagine what would have happened if the shoe had been on the other foot.  Let’s imagine that, say, a lesbian couple in Massachusetts, enraged by Cardinal Sean O’Malley’s decision to force Catholic Charities to drop out of offering adoption services rather than comply with a state law that bars discrimination against adoptive families because of the sexual orientation of the parents, had walked into the Cathedral in Boston’s South End a week ago today and opened fire.  Or if a gay couple living in a state where the Church of Latter Day Saints played a major role in passing a constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage had walked into Salt Lake City’s Mormon Tabernacle last Sunday and opened up.  The round the clock coverage would have gotten even Brad and Angelina’s new baby out of the news.  Yet shooting down some liberals gets barely a day’s notice.

And the media’s got a liberal bias?  Please.

Unlike Mr. Adkisson, the folks in my hypothetical examples above could make a concrete case that their lives had actually been harmed because of the actions of these denominations.  But you don’t see gays doing what Mr. Adkisson did.  Maybe it’s because we, unlike our religious opponents, remember Christ’s words about those who persecuted him as he hung on the cross:  “Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do.”

2 Responses to “Right Wing Killers”

Here, here! Perhaps part of why this didn’t get huge coverage was because the Unitarian Universalist community is not considered part of the mainstream religious sector of our country. They may not be large, but, by God, they know what inclusion and love are all about. Can’t say the same for many other denominations. Now that you are in your final stretch at GLSEN, what’s on the agenda when you leave?

On occasion, I read the online version of The Tennessean, Nashville’s primary newspaper. (I was born just an hour’s drive from there.) This weekend, the newspaper posted an article titled, “Church rededicates sanctuary week after shooting.” The reporter calls the shooting an act of “hatred for the liberal movement,” only mentioning the apparent gay angle once and without making it clear that hatred of gays was a major factor in the perpetrator’s anger. The article was posted Aug. 3. By today, aug. 4, only one comment had been appended by a reader. (It was explicitly directed in support of gays.) For comparison, consider another article in The Tennessean, posted today–a day later: It was titled, “Pregnant woman’s jailing questioned” and has already received 17 comments. Such silence would seem to suggest tacit approval by my hometown region. People ask me all the time why I left such a beautiful state. I usually just smile and say that I love NYC, which I do. However, I want to say (and often do!) that the state has beautiful topography, but the state of mind is severely lacking versus that “New York state of mind!”

Something to say?

You must be logged in to post a comment.